The space of a painting, literature, music, and its volume-are the result of overlap and interaction of different levels of intervention, different opacities creation ... miraculously show through something to see and be carefully considered, or at least give us that hope to lure actually respond to our questions. Funny how we always see beyond what you see on reality or how things seem transparent to our will when in fact they are opaque or at best mirror ...
Consider a painting: the pictorial space is just what and there you see the image of a universe of perceptions specifically optical privileged over others, ie a space dominated by light and visions. React to visual stimuli because we have optical devices and optical-visual faculties. The English word "optics" from the Greek "optik " view, is applied things related to light, vision or appliances, glasses, etc. (Intended to hone the vision of things, "more and better") therefore relates to prostheses for more see ... Somehow painting prosthesis acts of our eyes, makes us see more of what you see, further, deeper, to see the unseen, invisible. Surprisingly
contiguity in dictionaries of another word that absolutely has to do semantically with "optical" and yet it seems to extend its esoteric meaning ... I'm referring to the word "optimism", which philosophy would the allocation to the universe of the highest perfection as a work that is of an infinitely perfect, it is also a tendency to see or hope for the best of things. Assembled "optical" and "optimism" seems as if we wanted to reveal that "see and recognize" things to do with the optimism that sees and wants to see beyond what you see. The viewer is pessimistic that he sees nothing, just shadows, concealment strategies, extravagance ...
Any artistic creation-a painting, literature, music, etc .- act and intervene in our view of reality-optical device for more and better; to recognize best in-depth, and with a sense of optimism ... but apparently some words, stories, distilled pessimism in abundance or have a taste for cynicism. "You know that I read long ago that one way to tell is not to say or not say what is meant to draw attention to the thing, make us think about what we never thought enough and perhaps needed to define (and we dared not because of laziness or whatnot) ... Pau Llanes is not a pessimist, a cynic even though sometimes disguised with such Llanes coat ... Pau is your binoculars and your microscope if they want to surf trusted / a on his eye ... Never interpret their mis- words literally, but as literature ... Blessed
onlookers are also covered tables while, as Duchamp said, "and all those looks optimistic that dialogue with the literature, its authors, in their way ... and even recreate and invent again. What would an author without his perfect reader model? ... What a pair of blind and invisible ...
Consider a painting: the pictorial space is just what and there you see the image of a universe of perceptions specifically optical privileged over others, ie a space dominated by light and visions. React to visual stimuli because we have optical devices and optical-visual faculties. The English word "optics" from the Greek "optik " view, is applied things related to light, vision or appliances, glasses, etc. (Intended to hone the vision of things, "more and better") therefore relates to prostheses for more see ... Somehow painting prosthesis acts of our eyes, makes us see more of what you see, further, deeper, to see the unseen, invisible. Surprisingly
contiguity in dictionaries of another word that absolutely has to do semantically with "optical" and yet it seems to extend its esoteric meaning ... I'm referring to the word "optimism", which philosophy would the allocation to the universe of the highest perfection as a work that is of an infinitely perfect, it is also a tendency to see or hope for the best of things. Assembled "optical" and "optimism" seems as if we wanted to reveal that "see and recognize" things to do with the optimism that sees and wants to see beyond what you see. The viewer is pessimistic that he sees nothing, just shadows, concealment strategies, extravagance ...
Any artistic creation-a painting, literature, music, etc .- act and intervene in our view of reality-optical device for more and better; to recognize best in-depth, and with a sense of optimism ... but apparently some words, stories, distilled pessimism in abundance or have a taste for cynicism. "You know that I read long ago that one way to tell is not to say or not say what is meant to draw attention to the thing, make us think about what we never thought enough and perhaps needed to define (and we dared not because of laziness or whatnot) ... Pau Llanes is not a pessimist, a cynic even though sometimes disguised with such Llanes coat ... Pau is your binoculars and your microscope if they want to surf trusted / a on his eye ... Never interpret their mis- words literally, but as literature ... Blessed
onlookers are also covered tables while, as Duchamp said, "and all those looks optimistic that dialogue with the literature, its authors, in their way ... and even recreate and invent again. What would an author without his perfect reader model? ... What a pair of blind and invisible ...
Drawing: "Book of Hours ", 1991-92
0 comments:
Post a Comment