Quotes Hispanic Inspirational

Decline of lies and utopias ... Or how do alchemy with my body at dusk. Brief

Oscar Wilde

critical realism by only a vain attempt to represent reality, what for him had no merit and also over time cease to be credible and comprehensible ... For the great Irish author, the aim of Art must be a lie, ie to present the beauty of the false things (invented fiction, ideal). Wilde defends the lie in art can only represent the beauty lying and distorting reality. No lie there is no art that is a lie and poetry are arts ... Even more radical, he argues that ultimately the nature and life imitates art, and not vice versa, as traditionally understood: "Look one thing is very different to her. Do not see anything until it sees something her beauty. Then and only then, the thing comes into existence. Today people see the fog itself, but because poets and painters have shown the mysterious beauty of its effects. Probably has been for centuries in London fog ... but none seen so far, and we knew almost nothing about her "... With these assumptions Oscar Wilde raised issues of great interest, eg the primacy of the interpretation of the act itself, an interpretation of reality according to established codes, learned, including matters relating to Quantum mechanics and the conditions of observation of phenomena. Reality is not necessarily as we see, but what we interpret it or how we represent ... "as meaning the total purchase Wilde claim of an artistic look, the need for an artistic canon, on purely naturalistic considerations.

Decline the lie was one of Wilde's favorite texts, without a doubt one of the best in aesthetic criticism. He is a brilliant argument against the realistic art of his time, that by " monstrous worship of facts " intended to be the mirror of life and assumed capacity to represent more accurately ... For Wilde, its farmers "just to write novels so similar to life there is no way to believe in their plausibility . " That's why Art should never imitate life, for "Art not express anything other than himself ." Oscar Wilde believed that when the Arts waives its main means of imagination, is doomed to complete failure. His proposal is " attempting to renew the ancient art of Lie," a fundamental duty, and that lying is the most high and the proper purpose of all art that boasts ... Accusing

naturalistic art of the late nineteenth century, Wilde comes to argue that art is superior to nature, even life itself is "student" of art, learning from our artistic look. His praise of the lie has to do with his claim of beauty beyond its natural fact, when speaking of lies Wilde must understand "reworking" of reality, idealizing fiction recreation of a new artistic reality "created", ie lies in many aspects, building more than descriptive of the nature and reality of the events that occur. Oscar Wilde claimed the need for "total artist", complete, who can also be critical of their own expression. Calls for an art out of the moral-amoral, not immoral, served mostly to create states of being, of mind, existential, universal, they can not be mediated by morality and customs of each time their convention. An art and aesthetics "amoral" operating in the sense of creating a utopia of a society free from constraints practices devoted to contemplation, pleasure. In this "amoral" by Wilde understood as a violation of the rules, there is progress ... His artistic Utopia was not materialistic society, underpinned by the joy, pleasure, artistic values \u200b\u200bof imagination and invention, with time for reflection and self-expression, that irrepressible urge to artistic expression, to reveal yet what nature, life, art itself, have shown no ... the car will be done through individual creativity and critical thinking ... - Lie to me, my love, and tell me I'm your Utopia ... there are days in which a lie moves over a hundred wagons, ie a pair of tits on ...

Photos: "Alchemy on the Black River, Amazonas, Brazil, April 2005

How Much Diesel Does A Van Use

parable about optimism ... -And please read me a bit of attention, right?

The space of a painting, literature, music, and its volume-are the result of overlap and interaction of different levels of intervention, different opacities creation ... miraculously show through something to see and be carefully considered, or at least give us that hope to lure actually respond to our questions. Funny how we always see beyond what you see on reality or how things seem transparent to our will when in fact they are opaque or at best mirror ...

Consider a painting: the pictorial space is just what and there you see the image of a universe of perceptions specifically optical privileged over others, ie a space dominated by light and visions. React to visual stimuli because we have optical devices and optical-visual faculties. The English word "optics" from the Greek "optik " view, is applied things related to light, vision or appliances, glasses, etc. (Intended to hone the vision of things, "more and better") therefore relates to prostheses for more see ... Somehow painting prosthesis acts of our eyes, makes us see more of what you see, further, deeper, to see the unseen, invisible. Surprisingly

contiguity in dictionaries of another word that absolutely has to do semantically with "optical" and yet it seems to extend its esoteric meaning ... I'm referring to the word "optimism", which philosophy would the allocation to the universe of the highest perfection as a work that is of an infinitely perfect, it is also a tendency to see or hope for the best of things. Assembled "optical" and "optimism" seems as if we wanted to reveal that "see and recognize" things to do with the optimism that sees and wants to see beyond what you see. The viewer is pessimistic that he sees nothing, just shadows, concealment strategies, extravagance ...

Any artistic creation-a painting, literature, music, etc .- act and intervene in our view of reality-optical device for more and better; to recognize best in-depth, and with a sense of optimism ... but apparently some words, stories, distilled pessimism in abundance or have a taste for cynicism. "You know that I read long ago that one way to tell is not to say or not say what is meant to draw attention to the thing, make us think about what we never thought enough and perhaps needed to define (and we dared not because of laziness or whatnot) ... Pau Llanes is not a pessimist, a cynic even though sometimes disguised with such Llanes coat ... Pau is your binoculars and your microscope if they want to surf trusted / a on his eye ... Never interpret their mis- words literally, but as literature ... Blessed

onlookers are also covered tables while, as Duchamp said, "and all those looks optimistic that dialogue with the literature, its authors, in their way ... and even recreate and invent again. What would an author without his perfect reader model? ... What a pair of blind and invisible ...

Drawing: "Book of Hours ", 1991-92

Chemotherapy Cold Infection

EVERY MAN, EVERY WOMAN

This is a song that I liked it since forever, and for quite some time ago brings to mind a person who is very important to me. As I said, I feel beautiful song, I hope you enjoy it.






I sing to reach you through all the blue

I sing to show you bleed just like you
and dark in this prison
I am since I have
memory and my eyes are blind without your light
.

I sing to hug because I do not just turn you

I sing to get rid of the black strings
ideas and words that draw a line in the water dividing the indivisible

you and me.

One and one and one at

one by one and all in one on me.

One and one and one at

one by one and all in one in you.

I sing to listen for your voice is singing to the tune
nombrarte
in countless names and faces and signs
drop of water, bread, wheat fields, each spike

reflecting all the sun. Reflecting each spike

all the sun. Reflecting each spike

all the sun.

One and one and one at

one by one and all in one on me.

One and one and one at

one by one and all in one in you.

Roms Heart Gold Para Desmume

THE CUCKOO, FEAR, AND TECHNOLOGY FOOTBALL

In the past, were easily frightened children.
We scared them with "cute" character appearance indefinitely night, causing panic, and fear that reveals the boy overnight.
But that was true in the past. Today
even work cuckoo is in trouble, there are many cute unoccupied.
Today, scaring kids is much more difficult than other times.
Years ago when I was a kid, there was fear of entering a dark room, fearing that someone appeared someone, usually a relative or friend, behind the door and issued a huge "BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBUUUUUUUUUUUUUU" blood-curdling.
now used technological methods.
Now the boys are able to be sent each other text messages with irrelevant content "booed."
technological methods are decidedly ineffective. When an infant was "Ghost Train", which consisted of a train, which was on dark places, and people who appeared by surprise, among the dark, a look suitably scary. Not now .. images are passed by the phones, which have nothing frightening, and even if they did, the phone will tell us a little music worthy of the game, when we have a message, it takes away any surprise lime, and of course any possibility of terror.

Surely the technology has many positive uses, but also has several negative.

Honestly ... talking about scary issues, I prefer my childhood days and not today.